State v. Julie Kuropchak (A-41-13; 072718)
The municipal court’s admission of the Alcotest
results without the foundational documents required by
State v. Chun, 194 N.J. 54 (2009) was error. Further,
because the DDQ and DDR contained inadmissible
hearsay, which may have unduly influenced the
municipal court’s credibility findings, the matter is
remanded for a new trial.
No comments:
Post a Comment