EFFECTIVE DATE:
|
GENERAL ORDER # 055
|
||||||||
SUBJECT: SEARCH WARRANTS
|
|||||||||
ISSUED BY:
|
# OF PAGES: 10
|
||||||||
DISTRIBUTION:
|
REVIEW DATE:
|
||||||||
LAST REVISED:
|
|||||||||
ACCREDITATION STANDARDS:
|
43.1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The written directives
developed by the Police Department are for internal use only, and do not
enlarge an officer’s civil or criminal liability in any way. They should not be construed as the
creation of a higher standard of safety or care in an evidentiary sense, with
respect to third party claims.
Violations of written directives can only be the basis of a complaint
by this department, and then only in an administrative disciplinary setting.
|
|||||||||
PURPOSE: To set forth the
procedure to be utilized by all officers in applying for, executing and
documenting the search warrant process.
POLICY: The search warrant is
one of the most powerful weapons in the law enforcement arsenal. Properly obtained and executed, the search
warrant assists police and prosecutors in finding vital evidence, securing its
admissibility at trial, and ultimately obtaining a conviction. To that end, and pursuant to Attorney
General’s Law Enforcement Directive 2002-2, officers must submit a completed Search Warrant Approval Form to the designated Burlington County Assistant
Prosecutor for any search warrant being sought.
This is intended to ensure that search warrants are properly and
effectively utilized, and that officers are aware of and comply with all rules
and procedures established by law or Court Rules that are designed to safeguard
the rights of citizens under the United States and New Jersey Constitutions to
be free from unreasonable searches and seizures.
PROCEDURE:
I.
General
A.
The
Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits unreasonable
searches. Officers who conduct a search
without a warrant bear the burden of proving that the search was reasonable.
B.
Although there are certain situations where it is
prudent and necessary to conduct a search without first obtaining a warrant,
there are also reasons why officers should always attempt to secure a warrant,
whenever time and circumstances permit, rather than attempt to invoke one of
the exceptions to the written warrant requirement.
1.
The warrant shifts the burden of proof to the
defendant on the admissibility of the evidence.
· Warrantless
searches are, in effect, presumed by the courts to be unreasonable, and the
officer must prove to the court that the search, though warrantless, was
reasonable.
· Conversely,
a search conducted under the authority of a valid warrant is presumed by the
courts to be reasonable. In order to
challenge the validity of the search, the burden shifts to the defendant to
prove that the search was improper.
2.
The exceptions to the written warrant requirement
are often highly technical and generally very narrowly construed by the
courts.
3.
The practice of obtaining and properly executing a
valid search warrant will vastly increase the likelihood that evidence seized
as a result of the search will be deemed admissible by the courts.
4.
The existence of a valid search warrant greatly
reduces the chances of a defendant successfully suing an officer for a
violation of the defendant’s civil rights.
C. The decision to make
application for a search warrant shall be made by the investigator assigned to
the case and must be approved by a supervisor assigned to the investigative
bureau.
1.
If the patrol bureau is investigating the incident
giving rise to the need for a search warrant, the watch commander shall review
the need for such action and, if approved, the duty detective shall be summoned
to provide assistance with the search warrant process.
2.
The duty detective shall be responsible for
assisting patrol bureau personnel with all phases of the search warrant
proceedings.
II. Basis
for Issuance of a Search Warrant
A.
In order for an officer to satisfy the
requirements of Fourth Amendment in seeking a search warrant it will be
necessary for the officer to:
1.
Demonstrate that probable cause exists to conduct
the search,
2.
Present the underlying probable cause to a judge
while under oath,
3.
Ensure that the application and the warrant itself
specifically describe the place to be searched and the evidence being sought.
B.
In determining whether these requirements have
been satisfied, the judge is NOT entitled to rely on the judgment of law
enforcement officers. He or she is
expected to review the materials submitted to make a detached, independent
judgment as to the existence of probable cause.
1.
Thus, the importance of including all relevant
information in the search warrant application cannot be overstated.
2.
At a Motion to Suppress, the prosecutor cannot
introduce information for consideration that is not included in the search
warrant application.
III. Probable
Cause
A.
Probable cause does not require an absolute
certainty that the items sought will be found at a particular location, but, on
the other hand, a mere hunch or possibility is not enough.
B.
Upon considering a search warrant application, the
judge must make a practical, common sense decision whether, given all the
circumstances set forth in the application (affidavit), there is a fair
probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a
particular place.
C.
Although probable cause is generally considered
time-sensitive, it may not be necessary to show that there is probable cause to
believe that the evidence is presently to be found at the specified
location.
1.
If an officer can show that the evidence, though
not currently at the specified location, will be found there at some point in
the near future, the judge may issue a search warrant.
2.
These Anticipatory Search Warrants have
been approved by the courts provided an officer can show that the evidence is
on a “sure course” to arrive at the specified location.
D. There
is no set time limit to the timeliness of probable cause and it will be
determined by the circumstances that are generally unique to each case. However, in order to avoid a possible
judicial finding that probable cause has grown stale prior to the issuance of a
warrant, officers should act quickly to obtain a search warrant once they have
determined that they have probable cause to search a particular location.
IV. The
Affidavit
A.
In order to request issuance of a search warrant,
it will be necessary to make application with a judge in the form of an Affidavit.
1.
An affidavit is simply a signed, sworn statement
setting forth certain information regarding the proposed search.
2.
While an affidavit does not need to be a lengthy
or complex document, proper composition and wording are necessary to diminish
the likelihood of a successful challenge by defense counsel to the validity of
the warrant.
B.
To satisfy the constitutional requirement of
specificity, a search warrant affidavit should clearly state:
1.
The offense in relation to which the search is
being conducted.
2.
The person, place, or thing to be searched.
3.
The items to be searched for.
4.
The probable cause for believing that such items
are to be found at that location.
C.
In describing the “place to be searched”, it will
be necessary to describe specifically what it is that an officer desires to
search. (i.e., a specific house, a specific person or a specific automobile)
1.
The detailed description must appear in both the
affidavit and the warrant.
2.
The method or methods of describing the “place to
be searched” will vary depending on the circumstances.
3.
The description must be sufficiently precise to
make it clear to the officers executing the warrant, which premises are to be
searched.
D.
Where specific premises are to be searched, the
description of those premises shall include such items as:
1.
Street addresses.
2.
Physical description of the property.
3.
Legal description of the property (lot & block
number).
4.
The names of the owners or occupants.
5.
Map coordinates or distances from given points.
6.
Photographs, diagrams, maps, etc.
E.
A search conducted under a warrant may not exceed
the limits defined in the warrant. It is
therefore imperative that the affidavit and warrant describe all of the areas
that the officers desire to search.
1.
An important concept related to the search of
premises is the “curtilage”. This term
generally refers to the land immediately surrounding a residence and any
outbuildings found upon that land.
2.
Because the extent to which the court will
recognize the curtilage can be uncertain from case to case, if at all; it is
desirable to include specific references to a yard, garage, tool shed, barn,
etc. in the warrant description, when such building are known to exist.
F.
The “particularity” requirement of the Fourth
Amendment, that requires detailed identification of the person, place or thing to
be searched, also mandates that the warrant specifically describe the items to
be searched for.
1.
Therefore, it is necessary when applying for a
warrant to list in detail the items being sought.
· Setting
forth a detailed description of the items to be searched for will not
necessarily prevent the admission of other evidence found at the scene.
· However,
if the officers applying for the warrant have probable cause to believe that a
certain item will be found at the location specified, these items should be listed.
2.
It may be useful to include a statement in the
description of things to be searched, that the search is not just for the
entire item itself, but also for parts or pieces of that item.
G. Rule 3:5-5 provides that: “The
warrant must be executed within 10 days after its issuance and within the hours
fixed therein by the judge issuing it, unless for good cause shown the warrant
provides for its execution at any time of the day or night.”
1.
If the circumstances are such that it cannot be
determined when the search warrant will be executed, and as a result the
affiant is requesting permission to execute the warrant during any hour of the
day or night, then the affidavit in support of the application for the search
warrant must set forth specific reasons to justify such a warrant.
V. Approval
of Search Warrant (A.G. Directive 2002-2)
A.
All officers applying to a New Jersey Judge for
the issuance of a Search Warrant must first obtain the expressed authorization
of a designated Assistant Prosecutor.
1.
The Prosecutor has designated the Duty Prosecutor
as the appropriate point of contact for all officers seeking a Search Warrant.
2.
During regular business hours, the Duty Prosecutor
can be contacted at the Prosecutor’s Office.
Thereafter, the officer making application shall personally present the
Duty Prosecutor with the completed Affidavit, Search Warrant and Search Warrant
Approval Form.
3.
During non-business hours, the Duty Prosecutor
shall be contacted through Central Communications, and the officer making
application will be required to fax a copy of the Search Warrant Approval Form
to _________________.
B.
The Duty Prosecutor charged with reviewing the
Search Warrant Application is authorized to deny the application, approve the
application, amend the application or make approval of the application
contingent upon some further investigative step, notification and/or
consultation with some other law enforcement officer/agency or such other
action to be taken by the applicant as deemed necessary to satisfy the
requirements of the Attorney General’s directive governing Search warrants.
C.
In the event that a reviewing Duty Prosecutor
declines to approve an application, or conditionally approves an application
subject to a condition that has not been satisfied, the applicant, or any other
person representing the applicant’s law enforcement agency, shall be prohibited
from making an application to any other Prosecutor without revealing in the
successive application the fact that an application has previously been
reviewed by another Prosecutor.
D.
The officer who contacts the Duty Prosecutor to
seek review of the application for a Search Warrant should be the actual
affiant or lead officer associated with the investigation.
E.
The Duty Prosecutor responsible for reviewing the
application for a Search Warrant shall determine the appropriate Judge before
whom the application shall be made and shall additionally be responsible for
contacting the Judge.
F.
Any law enforcement officer having knowledge of an
application for or the execution of a Search warrant shall be strictly
prohibited from disclosing to a non law enforcement officer any facts contained
in or concerning the application for the warrant, or the fact that such a
warrant will or has been sought or executed, unless such disclosure is
expressly authorized by the County Prosecutor or his designee.
G.
The officer applying for issuance of a search
warrant is responsible for informing the reviewing Duty Prosecutor if
circumstances exist that would justify a request to the Judge for permission to
include special conditions relative to the manner of execution of the search
warrant (i.e., “no-knock”, special hours, etc.).
H.
Upon obtaining a search warrant from a Judge, the
assigned officer shall carefully review the warrant to ensure that all
pertinent information set forth in the Affidavit is accurately included and
that the warrant has been properly signed.
Officers shall not attempt to serve any search warrant that is known to
contain substantive or administrative errors.
VI. Search
Warrant Approval Form
A.
A Search Warrant Approval Form has been developed
by the Division of Criminal Justice for statewide utilization in conjunction
with the search warrant application process.
The use of the form is mandatory in all instances where an officer will
be seeking court approval for a search warrant.
The purpose of the form is two-fold:
1.
First, the form will assist the duty prosecutor
charged with reviewing the search warrant application in determining if there
is legal sufficiency for issuance of the search warrant.
2.
Second, the form seeks answers to a series of
questions intended to alert the reviewer to the possibility of an independent
investigative interest on the part of another law enforcement agency in the
target, informant or cooperating witness being utilized to support the search
warrant.
B.
The officer completing the Search Warrant
Application Form is not required to contact every other law enforcement agency
that might conceivably have an interest in the execution of the search
warrant. However, at a minimum the
investigating officer shall:
1.
Conduct a computerized NCIC criminal history
inquiry on the target to determine the existence of any pending criminal
complaints.
2.
Consult with the appropriate representative from a
specialized unit within the County Prosecutor’s Office to determine if similar
enforcement activities are occurring elsewhere in the county.
3.
It should be noted that in situations where a
criminal investigation develops swiftly and spontaneously, so that time is of
the essence in executing a search warrant, it would not be reasonable to expect
an officer to delay execution of a search warrant in order to determine whether
or not another law enforcement agency might have an interest in the target of
the investigation or the place to be searched.
C.
The Search Warrant Application Form and Approval
Process are not required for Administrative Search Warrants, or for Court
Orders to enter premises to retrieve weapons pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:25-21
(Domestic Violence) where the weapons to be seized are not believed to be
contraband, evidence or an instrumentality of a criminal offense.
D.
Completed Search Warrant Approval Forms are not
discoverable pursuant to R. 3:13-3 and shall not be included routine
discovery packages.
E.
Before leaving the office of the judge, officers
are directed to carefully review the warrant to make certain that it sets forth
all of the affidavit information accurately and completely, and that the
warrant has been signed in the proper place by the issuing judge.
VII.
Knock and Announce Rule
A.
The reasonableness requirement of the Fourth
Amendment requires officers to knock and announce their identity and purpose
before forcibly entering a dwelling.
This is known as the knock and announce rule.
B.
Officers armed with a search warrant to search a
dwelling must comply with the knock and announce rule, and failure to do so
will result in the suppression of evidence otherwise lawfully seized pursuant
to the warrant.
C.
The following describes several sets of
circumstances that have been identified as recognized exceptions to the knock
and announce rule that, when present, would justify an officer from dispensing
with the knock and announce requirement:
1.
Officer need not knock and announce their identity
and purpose if they have reason to believe that to do so would result in the
destruction of evidence sought.
2.
There is no need to comply with the knock and
announce rule where an arrest is also sought to be effected, AND the
police have reason to believe that compliance with the knock and announce rule
will substantially aid in the escape of the person sought.
3.
Compliance with the knock and announce rule is not
required where there is reason to believe that to do so would imperil the
safety of the officers or someone within the premises.
D.
Similarly, where following the knock, the persons
inside the premises engage in activities which justify the officers in
believing that the evidence sought is being destroyed or that a person to be
arrested is escaping, then compliance with the announcement portion of the
knock and announce rule is excused and force may be used to gain admittance, as
necessary.
E.
When officers knock and announce both their
identity and purpose, and the response is an expressed refusal to permit the
police to enter, then force may be used to gain admittance.
F.
Officers may force their way into the premises if,
after complying with the knock and announce rule, there is an implied refusal
of admittance. There are no set rules as
to the length of time that officers must wait after complying with the knock
and announce rule.
G.
The Courts have made it clear that the
reasonableness of a no-knock entry must be evaluated in light of the facts
known to the officers at the time of the entry.
H.
Although there is no statute that expressly authorizes
a judge to issue a “no-knock” search warrant, the Appellate Division (State
v. Goodson) assumed that a judge may issue a no-knock search warrant. The officer applying for the warrant will
need to provide the judge with sufficient facts that would justify dispensing
with the knock and announce rule.
VIII. Operational
Plan and Briefing
A.
Prior to executing any search warrant, the lead
investigator shall be required to formulate an Operational Plan
detailing the planned operation. The Operations
Plan Checklist shall be used to assist the lead investigator in the
preparation of a comprehensive operations plan.
B.
The Operational Plan shall address the
following areas:
1.
Operational overview – Included shall be a brief
synopsis of the investigation that led to the issuance of the search warrant,
type of warrant (knock or no-knock), address and description of the target
location, number and identity of probable occupants at target location, number
and identity of persons for whom arrest warrants have been issued, number and
identity of persons to be searched in accordance with the warrant.
2.
Personnel assignments
· Supervisory
personnel and the incident commander
· Entry
Team
· Search
Teams
· Evidence
Collection
· Photography
· Perimeter
Teams
· Arrestee
Security/Transportation
3. Authorized
equipment and weapons
4. Designated
hospitals for injured officers/civilians
5. Designated
police radio channel (primary and secondary)
6. Location
of processing/holding facility
7. Special
instructions/information
C.
All Operational Plans must be submitted to
the investigative bureau supervisor for preliminary review and approval. Final review and approval must be made by the
operations division commander or, in his absence, an alternate command officer.
D.
All law enforcement personnel participating in the
execution of a search warrant will be instructed to muster at a designated time
and location in order to facilitate a complete briefing of the proposed
operation. The officer in charge or his
designee (briefing Officer) shall conduct the operational briefing.
IX.
Executing the Search Warrant
A.
Only law enforcement officers shall be present
during the execution of a search warrant unless extenuating circumstances exist
and the presence of non law enforcement personnel is deemed necessary and has
been approved by a command officer.
1.
In Wilson v. Layne, the United States
Supreme Court held that the Fourth Amendment forbids police to allow reporters
to be present during the execution of an arrest or search warrant in a private
residence.
B.
Comply with the knock and announce rule unless
armed with a “no-knock” search warrant.
C.
Once inside the target premises, locate those
persons who are to be searched pursuant to the warrant or who are to be
arrested pursuant to arrest warrants.
1.
Persons named in arrest warrants shall be
handcuffed at the earliest opportunity.
2.
Generally, a warrant to search a premises does not
authorize a search of each person in those premises at the time the warrant is
executed.
3.
A warrant to search a premises does not even
authorize a frisk of a suspect found in those premises unless there is a
reasonable belief that the suspect is armed and presently dangerous.
4.
However, when the warrant authorizes a search for
contraband, occupants of the premises who are not named in either the search or
arrest warrants may be detained while the search is being conducted. Questions designed to elicit basic
identification information may be asked.
5.
After searching the persons who are to be searched
pursuant to the warrant or incident to their arrest, gather all occupants of
the premises at one location and read the search warrant verbatim to the
occupants. Give a copy of the search
warrant to any persons whose premises are to be searched.
D.
Read Miranda Warnings to all occupants and make
sure all of the persons present understand the warnings.
E.
While the warrant and Miranda Warnings are being
read to the occupants, designated officers shall photograph and/or videotape
the premises to mitigate any claims of damage caused by officers during the
execution of the search warrant.
F.
Assign sufficient personnel to secure the
occupants to prevent interference with the search and/or destruction of
evidence.
G.
Officers are authorized to search any container
that could reasonably contain the objects sought by the warrant. The general rule is that the object of the
search governs the scope of the search.
H.
Officers assigned to the search teams shall use
care to ensure that the premises and its contents are not unnecessarily damaged
as a result of the search.
1.
Any item that is not seized as a result of the
search shall be returned to its original location.
2.
Reckless destruction of property is prohibited and
may subject an officer to discipline and/or civil liability.
I.
The object of the search limits the scope of the
search. Common sense dictates that
officers who are searching for a television cannot find it in a pill
bottle. Thus, a search of a pill bottle
by an officer armed with a search warrant for a television would not be
authorized by the warrant and any evidence found in the pill bottle would
likely be suppressed.
1.
Also, if the warrant identifies only a particular
item that is being sought, once that item is found the authorization to search
is terminated.
2.
However, if the warrant authorizes a search for
items of a general type, rather than specific items, the search authorization
would not terminate upon finding the first item. For example, authorization for a search for
“explosive devices” would not terminate merely because one such device was
located.
J.
Upon completion of the search, a copy of the
warrant and a Search Warrant Receipt form shall be given to each person
from whom property was seized pursuant to the warrant, and to each person from
whose premises property was seized pursuant to the warrant.
1.
The person shall be asked to sign the receipt
acknowledging exactly what property police seized.
2.
If there are no persons present at the premises
during the search, a copy of the search warrant and the receipt form
shall be left in a conspicuous location within the premises.
3.
In situations where the person refuses to sign the
receipt or there are no persons present at the premises, a supervisory officer
shall be summoned to verify the accuracy of the receipt and thereafter shall
co-sign the receipt to attest to its accuracy.
K.
Court Rule 3:5-5 requires the officer executing
the warrant to leave a receipt with the person from whom or from
whose premises property is taken pursuant to a search warrant. It also requires the officer to file an inventory
with the Return of Search Warrant. For
purposes of the above-cited Court Rule, the receipt and inventory are to be
considered the same document, i.e. the Search Warrant Receipt form.
X.
Return and Filing
A.
The officer who filed the original affidavit in
support of the search warrant shall be responsible for following through with
the process to ensure that all procedural steps are accomplished in a timely
fashion.
B.
Promptly after concluding the search, and in no
case later than 48 hours after the search is concluded, the officer shall make
arrangements to appear in front of the judge who issued the search
warrant. The officer must deliver to the
issuing judge the following documents:
1.
The original Search Warrant.
2.
The original receipt/inventory (Search Warrant
Receipt).
3.
The Return of Search Warrant form.
· The
officer shall sign the Return of Search Warrant form in the presence of
the judge who administers the oath to the officer.
· The
judge then signs the Return of Search Warrant in two places indicated on
the form.
XI.
Telephonic Search Warrants
A.
A telephone authorized search warrant may be
upheld as valid if the officer can show both the existence of probable cause
for the search and seizure, AND that the failure to obtain a written
warrant was necessitated by exigent circumstances.
B.
Circumstances giving rise to emergency situations
which have been upheld by the courts include, but are not limited to:
1.
The degree of urgency involved/amount of time
necessary to obtain a warrant;
2.
Reasonable belief that contraband is about to be
removed;
3.
The possibility of danger to police officers
guarding the site of the contraband while a search warrant is sought;
4.
Information indicating that the possessors of the
contraband are aware that the police are on their trail; and
5.
The ready destructibility of the contraband and
the knowledge that efforts to dispose of the contraband and to escape are
characteristic behavior of persons engaged in this type of crime.
C.
The following are the general guidelines for
issuance a telephonic search warrant:
1.
The applicant police officer must suitably
identify himself.
2.
The officer must specify the purpose of his
request.
3.
The officer must also disclose the basis for the
information he intends to impart to the judge and MUST be placed
under oath or affirmation by the judge before presenting any information.
4.
The judge will make a contemporaneous record of
the application, whether by tape or stenographic recording or by making
adequate notes thereof.
5.
The judge will also make a contemporaneous record
or notation of his factual determination as to exigent circumstances and
probable cause.
6.
The judge will memorialize the specific terms of
his authorization to search. Further,
promptly after such authorization, the judge will issue a written confirmatory
search warrant and shall file that warrant together with all documents
evidencing the oral application and authorization with the clerk of the court.
D.
Court Rule 3:5-3(b) explains that the sworn
testimony given by the officer over the telephone to the judge “shall be
deemed to be an affidavit for the purpose of issuance of a search warrant”.
1.
If the judge is satisfied that the exigent
circumstances and probable cause are sufficient, he will note this in writing
and direct the officer “to enter his authorization verbatim on a form, or other
appropriate paper, which shall be designated as the Duplicate Original
Search Warrant.
2.
This “Duplicate Original Search Warrant” shall be
deemed a valid search warrant. The judge
will then direct the officer to print the judge’s name on the
warrant. By completing these procedural
steps, the officer is permitted to utilize the telephonic search warrant in the
same way he would utilize a standard written warrant.
No comments:
Post a Comment