IN THE MATTER OF REGISTRANT P.B. A-3549-11T1
This Megan's Law tiering appeal
arises from a conviction
for third-degree endangering the
welfare of a child based on possession of child pornography on a home computer.
Applying the clear-and-convincing
evidence standard, we
held that the
"penetration" element of the "degree of contact" criterion on
the Registrant Risk Assessment Scale could not be satisfied merely by a showing
of possession of pornographic materials depicting penetration "without any
concomitant indication that [the registrant] played a role in the penetrative
activity either as a participant or a producer."
We also held that a showing of the
quantity of material alone, without any "proofs via expert witnesses or
otherwise,. . . proffered to establish the length of time the material may have
been on registrant's computer, or how much time would have been required to
compile the quantity discovered," did not satisfy the proof requirements
needed for any finding on the "duration of offensive behavior"
criterion.
In dictum, we emphasized the
prohibitions of Rule 1:36-3 regarding the citation or use of unpublished
opinions; criticized reliance by the trial court on an argument made in another
matter in reaching its findings and conclusions, without fully articulating the
argument made for the benefit of opposing counsel and the record; and commented
upon the duty of county prosecutors to administer Megan's Law uniformly from
county to county. 07-26-12
No comments:
Post a Comment